Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zhicheng Lin's avatar

I would like to share my perspectives on the home bias in citation in China. For context, I am a native Chinese with a BS from China and a PhD from the US. My background is in psychology, but I have recently conducted research on metascience (or science of science), on topics like authorship inflation, diversity, etc. I have also collaborated with several researchers in mainland China.

You mentioned two accounts explaining home bias in citations: 1) Chinese science of higher quality than people outside China realize; and 2) China’s government directive.

There is a third one in play here: Chinese researchers may cite coworkers -- particularly those senior and with power -- so as not to offend them and to please them. Indeed, in one of my recent collaborations with a Chinese professor, I was curious about the presence of several citations of a senior professor from Tsinghua, and was basically told the reason. Of course, the citations are relevant, so there is no ill-play here, but it's also completely fine to not cite some of those.

Expand full comment
Rick Mandler's avatar

Implicit in discussions like, how does the US catch up to Chinese manufacturing capacity or weapons production capacity or E.V. technology or applied sciences, or… you get the point… is the failure of globalism in business to nurture democracy and commitment to rules based foreign policy around the world. If China was a democratic nation we wouldn’t have nearly the adversarial relationship we have today. We compete with Germany, Japan and Korea but they are democratic nations with substantial commitment to international law.

Expand full comment
112 more comments...

No posts