Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DougAz's avatar

I went to MIT, SB Physics, but a half dozen courses at Sloan. Notably, then Macro taught by Samuelson, with TA Paul Krugman occaisionally for something I forget. So how could I be a fan of the Austrians, Freidman, and various "curve fitting, data and boundary adjusting" conservative economists. Most who obviously placed "agenda" over "scientific method" and "objective analysis". Here is an autobiography from Krugman: https://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/incidents.html

You illustrate the two greatest things about Paul Krugman. It takes great comprehension to correctly and properly simplify complex technical things. I think you also have this Noah.

Secondly, Krugman who has a very high perch in the Economic field, is open to change, new data, new analysis, being wrong and not holding on. This is extraordinary.

Factoid of small interest. Ben Netay, the name Benjamin Netanyahu used while at MIT, also was in classes at Sloan. We spoke, but not that I recall in an Econ class. Robert Solow remembers him.

https://news.mit.edu/1996/netanyahu-0605

Thanks Noah for the awesome perspective on Paul Krugman.

Expand full comment
Necia L Quast's avatar

I enjoyed this very much. I have been a fan of Krug man for decades, before he even before he started writing for the Times. But I am most the most grateful for was his willingness to point out that the administration of George W. Bush was often flat out lying to us, when most people were unwilling to accept that the President would do that. Sometimes I felt like I was crazy as apparently no else noticed, so when Krugman did and said so, that meant a lot.

Expand full comment
66 more comments...

No posts