Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SRS's avatar

Modi is India’s Prime Minister, not President.

India does have a President who is elected by the central and state legislatures, but is mostly a ceremonial figure, with no real power.

Comparing Modi to Xi is emblematic of the ignorance and condescension that is embedded into how even people who might claim to be “India hands” view India.

Xi is a dictator. Modi, on the other hand, has won election after election since 2002, but has worked his ass off to win those votes. He has then governed as both a moderniser and a welfare-statist focused on getting Govt benefits directly into the hands of the poor. And it is they who are his most ardent supporters, even more than urban Indians, who where his party(the BJP)’s base originally.

5 Indian states with a collective population a little less than that of the US just concluded in India, with the results out yesterday. Modi’s party was the incumbent in 4 of them and won all 4 handily; they got clobbered in the 5th (Punjab), but have always been a marginal player there. One of these states (Uttar Pradesh) has 220M people, and has never re-elected a state government since 1985. And in fact, most Indian states rarely re-elect their state Governments, which is why this lack of anti-incumbency is so astonishing, even to veteran observers of Indian elections. And no one doubts that it was Modi that was the deciding factor in all these states.

For now, Modi IS India.

Expand full comment
IndianConservative's avatar

This reinforces my belief that I, and every other patriotic Indian, need to work to strengthen the Modi government and the Hindi base as much as possible. Otherwise India would end up becoming a satellite state, susceptible to be bullied by American liberals -- who will gain much more prominence in coming years. We must do everything we can to empower and strengthen the Indian right further to negate the American influence as much as possible.

Second, a miscalculation in this post is that current Indian government is "forced" to choose sides because of dependence on Russian military equipments. That assertion ignores the fact that Modi was sanctioned and had his US visa denied before becoming the prime minister. He is totally aware of the danger American liberals pose to everything from India's national security interest to family values. India would have abstained, irrespective of its dependence on Russia.

I wish India could make it clear that time-tested friendship with Russia is not up for sale. But the current diplomatic and geopolitocal realities doesn't allow for that. Nevertheless, the Indian political establishment need to be more careful of the United States and stay wary of it going forward.

Expand full comment
118 more comments...

No posts