Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard's avatar

Yeah, being even more hawkish against Putin probably is the best electoral strategy for the Dems.

Problems I see are that:

1. I don't trust Dems to act smartly in election strategy. They seem to care more about winning faculty lounge debates than votes (still majority working class), sadly enough.

2. A portion of the GOP are Putin bootlickers, but they also have an extremely hawkish wing (Rubio, Graham, etc.) and the GOP has owned that brand for several decades now so stealing that away would be tough.

3. The autocrat-loving (America-hating/head-in-the-sands) Left may be tiny electorally but have an outsized voice and it would be easy for the GOP to tie all Dems to the Lefty fringe. Dems _should_ tie the GOP to Putin in return, but again, that requires Dems to actually be good at this electioneering thing. And even then, they may struggle as much as Macron vs. LePen.

Expand full comment
Grayson Reim's avatar

I'm 31 years old now. We've been at war, in essence, for 20 of them. There seems to be a constant drumbeat warning of us of another enemy just around the corner - Al Qaeda, The Taliban, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, etc. - while little has been done at home. It's not to say what's going on abroad isn't terrible, just that I think most people, especially the young, are pretty tired of the war beat and are looking for something different.

Expand full comment
65 more comments...

No posts