Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sassy's avatar

The point about the shared lawn without much to do in that lawn, vs having tons of restaurants, cafes, bars, and stores in a neighborhood being incredibly freeing, is something I think a lot of urbanism activists in the US miss. There's a really strong anti-business segment of the US urbanism crowd that is vehemently opposed to shared spaces that people pay to use. I think that daily life in Tokyo really shows how business and good urbanism are absolutely not enemies.

In addition, something almost completely missing from the urbanism discussion in the West, is integrating industrial uses in dense urban environments. I work at a small industrial company, and it's so nice to be able to walk not only to my office, but also to my company's labs and workshops in the same neighborhood. Not every industrial building is an oil refinery or a rocket static firing range. Even though a sizable lab or workshop, or small factory or warehouse does present a longer than optimal blank wall to the street, they can fit well enough, and people working jobs that aren't office or retail should be able to live and work in nice neighborhoods.

Though on the topic of safety, I think improving the safety of US cities is very important. Even though NYC is fairly safe by US standards, it could be an order of magnitude better and still be short of world leaders. I really enjoyed your article a while back about Professionalizing the Police, and would be interested in hearing a more complete argument in why and how to improve safety in US cities. It feels like the safety debate in the US was stuck between the "law and order" types with mostly bad ideas about how to improve law and order, and "defund the police (literally)" types whose only response to legitimate safety concerns is gaslighting.

Expand full comment
Daniel Situnayake's avatar

As a European who has lived all over the US for the past 14 years, this is what frustrates me: there’s clear market demand for mixed use development, since the cities and neighborhoods where it exists are always the most expensive to buy or rent a home.

I’m not just talking about New York and San Francisco, but the cute little historic main street of any American town you choose, where mixed use is grandfathered in. Why does modern planning prohibit the sensible kind of living that our ancestors figured out a thousand years ago?

Expand full comment
116 more comments...

No posts