Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Xavier Moss's avatar

I think there's a lot of interesting things going on in the merging of corporate culture and woke culture, especially as an 'etiquette' for the professional class – I think a lot of the harm of woke excess comes from that merger. Even before the woke movement, corporate trainings were creepy and humiliating, and the current language policing really reminds me of having to say 'challenges' instead of 'problems' and generally contort my speech in a professional context.

I think a lot of this is out of a corporate desire to ensure obedience in employees to minimise risk for the company, and adding wokeness to it gives it a moral underpinning that is harder to rebel against. I always went for a 'cigarette break' (I don't smoke) during energisers at conferences, but you can't do that at a DEI training. Students protesting professors for ridiculous reasons is nothing new; the dominance of HR risk-aversion in university administrations causes those protests to be threatening.

This kind of corporate-approved woke behaviour is becoming a class marker for professionals, and since upper class markers by definition need to exclude the lower classes, I worry that the excesses will become stronger to keep the class barriers high.

Expand full comment
JJ's avatar

Excellent post, as always. My one piece of criticism, though, is about the ACLU bit. Yes, they have had some internal debate about the way forward in an era of wokeness. It’s surely true that “Prominent figures within the organization have argued that the First Amendment is a tool of oppression, since it’s more easily used by the powerful than by the oppressed.” But also, the ACLU literally won the biggest Supreme Court First Amendment case in years yesterday, less than 24 hours before you posted this. Criticisms of the ACLU for going too woke often fail to acknowledge that they are still out there doing great work on the First Amendment every day. That they’re having debate over the scope of their work shouldn’t let us lose sight of the fact that they’re still the most effective defenders of the First Amendment in the courts that we have.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts