Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Hugh-Jones's avatar

A couple of comments.

1. I think you’re too quick to dismiss what you call “oral tradition”. I’d suggest that *stories* are a kind of zeroth technology. Before written history, humans had already (for millennia!) found ways to embody their knowledge in ways that they could pass down. The basic function was narrative: folk tales, myths, and so on. By 0 AD there’s already 100-300m humans on the planet - many orders of magnitude more than the chimpanzees our nearest relatives. That suggest our cumulative knowledge was already doing a lot, before writing was widespread enough to have much effect.

2. AI may really be discovering deep principles. It just doesn’t know how to explain them to us yet. If that’s true, then work on interpretable AI may help these models tell us the new laws they have discovered. After all, there must be some regularity there, otherwise how could they make their predictions?

Expand full comment
DxS's avatar

"Trade" was as critical as "history". Consider how many separate expert products go into a semiconductor factory. Or how the potter's wheel disappeared in Britain, after Rome's fall. Why? Because there was no longer enough population density and social trust to support full-time potters.

Without specialization, humans have a hard limit on their tools and productivity.

Without trade, there's not much room for specialization.

Expand full comment
115 more comments...

No posts