Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee Drake's avatar

This is exactly right. Only one point to add - solar panels are technically a semi-conductor and operate like computer chips in reverse - instead of converting energy into information, they convert information (photons) into energy. But they benefit from the equivalent of Moore’s law (Swanson’s law in solar speak; cost drops by 20% as shipments double). The 75% drop seen from 2009-2019 is consistent with solar’s history.

What makes the solar’s Moore’s law different is that is smashed past a key benchmark sometime during COVID - it at its most expensive became cheaper than fossil fuels at their cheapest. We have no alternative to computer chips, so as Moore’s law chugs along for them we just seem incremental benefits. But imagine that we had an alternative information generator than computers that our society was based around - and suddenly computers became faster and cheaper than that - we’d never stop talking about it. That’s essentially what has happened with solar. The price drop is same as it ever was, but now it has smashed past the floor fossil fuels must rest forever upon.

If we see more shipments than expected because of this, then the 75% price drop anticipated over the next 10 years represents a very conservative baseline. Costs so far appear to be pegged to shipments, and those will increase drastically if it is a cheaper energy source than all the alternatives.

Expand full comment
William Jelavich's avatar

I just saw that Maryland is starting a Solar Canopy grant program in 2023 for parking structures

https://energy.maryland.gov/business/Pages/incentives/PVEVprogram.aspx

This looks like the a good direction. Nuclear has benefits in the short term to wean us off using coal. I an optimistic it will stick around somehow.

Expand full comment
73 more comments...

No posts