Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Can's avatar

I generally like this article but I think "But current vaccines do not stop you from transmitting Delta to others" is problematic enough that you should IMO change it.

1) The study in Eric's tweet is about AZ which is not available in the US and there seems to be good evidence that it's less effective against Delta than the mRNA vaccines.

2) You probably already know this and it's mostly hedging against anti-vaxxers (and potentially compatible with your sentence) but the vaccines reduce your chance of being infected in the first place so that reduces transmission.

3) There's decent emerging evidence that infected vaccinated people have less infectious virus (even though viral loads may be high) and that the period during which they are infectious is shorter.

Expand full comment
Tom Warner's avatar

I know you don't want to hear it but you should have left this question to experts. You and I absolutely don't know whether it would be medically useful or not. I suppose it depends on the minutiae of how differently the variants behave.

I am skeptical as I have not seen evidence of severe disease among the vaxed except among severely immunocompromised. If boosters are not medically useful and are merely a political project to make the vaxed feel better during an epidemic among the vaxed, that would be a waste and distraction from the real problem of getting more people vaxed.

But I'd pay attention to an expert making this recommendation. There just isn't any value in you weighing in here.

About

Expand full comment
57 more comments...

No posts