Excellent. Is there also the flaw of not assuming fraud is always on the table? That it is always a possibility? The point of due diligence is that trust is not enough. Snookering happens. Has happened throughout history. Is wariness somehow aligned with lack of bravery?
Excellent. Is there also the flaw of not assuming fraud is always on the table? That it is always a possibility? The point of due diligence is that trust is not enough. Snookering happens. Has happened throughout history. Is wariness somehow aligned with lack of bravery?